Skip to main content

Integration in Internet ?

Nowadays, the business need of system integration in one company become more and more important task. Many companies search for good, cheep and easily developed portal solutions so they can make one common entry point for their systems and no doubt, the best Microsoft solution for this task is the SharePoint platform.

While companies and enterprise integration have many options and products, what about the Internet integration? Is there a simple and no resources required way to recreate the idea of integration?

The reason for trying to do this is the fact that there are many areas in internet where we can make a portal collecting different sources and information and making this in a very simple and cheep way. And of course, if we make good and useful portal, this will not be a waste of time ad money.
Making or using some crawlers and displaying the results in categorized way is good but not so cheep solution.
As a big fen of Google, I try to combine their services and to see how can I recreate the idea of integration. 
I get for example my personal "web systems"- two blogs, facebook profile, personal web site. And the picture is something like this:



The personal site will be the user entry point and will have RSS from the blogs and facebook profile. The data storage will be the Picasa (for images) and code.google.com(for files) and the monitoring will be Google Analytics.

Actually, the example is not very clear but the idea of iterating things is really good concept and it's worth to be experimented with it.
And to best thing is such approaches is that we don't replace the existing systems ( in many case this is impossible), we just combine them and get to the user better experience and analytics data.


...

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

ClientPeoplePicker in SharePoint 2013

Start using SharePoint 2013 I noticed that the way for selecting people or groups is changed. The new way is simple – just ‘Enter name or email address’ without any icons for ‘Check Names’ or ‘Browse’. I guess that the PeoplePicker is changed but NO. PeoplePicker sitll has the same functionality as before. There is a new control called ClientPeoplePicker . How to use it: 1. Add this references <% @ Register TagPrefix ="wssawc" Namespace ="Microsoft.SharePoint.WebControls" Assembly ="Microsoft.SharePoint, Version=15.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=71e9bce111e9429c" %> 2. Add the following control declaration       < wssawc : ClientPeoplePicker          Required ="true"          ValidationEnabled ="true"          ID ="peoplePicker"          runat ="server"   ...

SharePoint and List Joins with CAML

This came to me as an issue when I started migrating one project from SharePoint 2010 to SharePoint 2013. The code uses LINQ to SharePoint and it was not written in a clever way. We decide to use CAML queries and optimize the code. The scenario: Create gridview that gathers information from three(or more) lists. The problem: How to create the CAML query joins and projected fields correctly. Explanation : Option 1: Get generated CAML query from LINQ to SharePoint code This doesn’t work. I wrote the LINQ to SharePoint code connected the three lists. When I executed the code the following error was thrown – “ The query uses unsupported elements, such as references to more than one list, or the projection of a complete entity by using EntityRef/EntitySet. ” Here is some explanation about it and why this can’t be used. Option 2: Write the query yourself I found this article in MSDN . Read it ! The second part in it is exactly my scenario. But it takes me a lot of time to un...

SharePoint 2016: High Availability Farm Topology

MinRole concept was introduced in SharePoint 2016 and it aims to simplify the process of designing the farms. However, I still find ambiguous information about the count of servers in SharePoint 2016 farm. Let's ask ourselves the question - What is the minimum number of servers which allow High Availability MinRole farm? According to technet   we have the following options: Small High Availability (HA) MinRole farm 4 Four servers with two shared roles: ·         Two Front-end with Distributed Cache servers ·         Two Application with Search servers Medium High Availability (HA) MinRole farm (Search optimized) 6 Six servers with both dedicated and shared roles: ·         Two Front-end with Distributed Cache servers ·         Two Application servers ·    ...