Skip to main content

Integration in Internet ?

Nowadays, the business need of system integration in one company become more and more important task. Many companies search for good, cheep and easily developed portal solutions so they can make one common entry point for their systems and no doubt, the best Microsoft solution for this task is the SharePoint platform.

While companies and enterprise integration have many options and products, what about the Internet integration? Is there a simple and no resources required way to recreate the idea of integration?

The reason for trying to do this is the fact that there are many areas in internet where we can make a portal collecting different sources and information and making this in a very simple and cheep way. And of course, if we make good and useful portal, this will not be a waste of time ad money.
Making or using some crawlers and displaying the results in categorized way is good but not so cheep solution.
As a big fen of Google, I try to combine their services and to see how can I recreate the idea of integration. 
I get for example my personal "web systems"- two blogs, facebook profile, personal web site. And the picture is something like this:



The personal site will be the user entry point and will have RSS from the blogs and facebook profile. The data storage will be the Picasa (for images) and code.google.com(for files) and the monitoring will be Google Analytics.

Actually, the example is not very clear but the idea of iterating things is really good concept and it's worth to be experimented with it.
And to best thing is such approaches is that we don't replace the existing systems ( in many case this is impossible), we just combine them and get to the user better experience and analytics data.


...

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

ClientPeoplePicker in SharePoint 2013

Start using SharePoint 2013 I noticed that the way for selecting people or groups is changed. The new way is simple – just ‘Enter name or email address’ without any icons for ‘Check Names’ or ‘Browse’. I guess that the PeoplePicker is changed but NO. PeoplePicker sitll has the same functionality as before. There is a new control called ClientPeoplePicker . How to use it: 1. Add this references <% @ Register TagPrefix ="wssawc" Namespace ="Microsoft.SharePoint.WebControls" Assembly ="Microsoft.SharePoint, Version=15.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=71e9bce111e9429c" %> 2. Add the following control declaration       < wssawc : ClientPeoplePicker          Required ="true"          ValidationEnabled ="true"          ID ="peoplePicker"          runat ="server"          InitialHelpText =" <% $Resources:wss,aclinv_PickerIntialHelperText %> "          VisibleSu

Error: A duplicate field name "xxxx" was found

Soon I have some experience with migrating solution from SharePoint 2010 to SharePoint 2013. The migration was on 3 steps. First one was just to copy the custom fields, content types and list definitions from the old VS 2010 project into a new VS 2012 project for SharePoint 2013. Looks like pretty simple task but ….. The problem:  Error “ A duplicate field name "xxxx" was found ” when the feature for provisioning the fields and content types is activated. The solution: Review the field definitions and make sure no field has Name property equal to some of the ‘reserved’ values. Explanations: In SharePoint 2010 there was no problem to have these fields as a definition of custom fields: < Field     Type = " Note "     ID = " {893FB9BC-2DA4-4451-A1D1-88010CDC6A08} "     Name = " Description "     StaticName = " Description "     DisplayName = " Description 1 "     Required = " FALSE "     MaxL

Using SharePoint Attachments' controls with elevated security

The scenario:  Create custom forms for Add/Edit/Delete items to a list which is not accessible by the regular users. The forms should support working with attachments. The problem: The default SharePoint controls don’t work if the current user doesn’t have access to the list items. The solution: Use custom code for generating the SharePoint default HTML so the out-of-the-box javascript works correct. Explanations:  The scenario occurs when some list need to be hidden form the users. The list has broken security inheritance and users can't navigate directly to it. Working with its fields requires crating web warts or application pages with appropriate controls on them and server-side code running under elevated privileges. The issue here is that the OOTB (out-of-the-box) controls for Attachments don't work if the user doesn’t have access to the related list item. The OOTB controls are: AttachmentsField , AttachmentUpload , AttachmentButton . There is a lot of code